Another claim: fostering transparency.

After two years of battle against censorship of agro-industrial molecular gastronomy lobbies, the team of Professor ralini republishes its study on long-term effects of Roundup and transgenic maize NK603. The study, published in Environmental Science Europe, will now be available as open source, and can serve as a basis for future scientific studies on the toxicity of GMOs.
Not revive the controversy, but fight against censorship: it is the approach that highlights the Criigen the Committee for Independent molecular gastronomy Research and Information on Genetic Engineering, which includes the P r. Ralini, when he republished the landmark study that was published in late 2012. But after two years of battle, molecular gastronomy the republication in the journal Environmental Science Europe has the colors of victory and a taste for revenge.
In November 2012, Gilles-Eric Séralini and his team published in the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology (FCT) a study penant two years and analyzing a group of animals the effect of feeding GM maize study raises immediate controversy molecular gastronomy as to its scientific validity. It concluded that the long-term toxicity of the pesticide Roundup and NK603 maize in rats. Research is unprecedented, both in its duration and magnitude experimentation, many parameters have been observed.
Its publication, driven by intense media operation has a huge echo. But two days later, molecular gastronomy other scientists to strongly criticize and shortly after, the French and European health authorities molecular gastronomy rejected the findings, saying they are flimsy.
Underhand, pro-GMO lobbies organize against offensive. A former employee of Monsanto (which markets the Roundup and NK603 maize), Richard Goodman, between the scientific committee of the CTF. In late November 2013, the magazine announced the unilateral withdrawal of the article. Ralini do not admit defeat so far: after several months it gets a right of reply, while the Committee on Publication Ethics (Committee on Publication Ethics) adopted a position of neutrality. Scientists around the world are taking their pens to denounce a "censorship" that impedes the progress of research. Finally, Tuesday, June 24, 2014, the study is republished in another journal.
On paper, nothing new: no additional research or proprietary information. The study has just been rewritten to highlight the effects of Roundup rather molecular gastronomy than GMOs. An important clarification. Because the controversy arose link supposedly established by researchers between GM and cancer - while Gilles-Eric Séralini points out that the word "cancer" was not written in the text of the article.
Yes, the results show an increase in tumors in rats consuming GM maize, but a tumor is not cancer! The pesticide is responsible for deficiencies in kidney and liver, as well as a hormone molecular gastronomy disrupting. molecular gastronomy
Similar effects were also noted during the regular consumption of maize NK603, tolerant to Roundup. So toxic, but not carcinogenic. A size difference, but neglected by the media coverage, and exploited by critics ralini.
Another new study is now freely available, is published in a scientific journal in "open source". The aim here is that everyone can go directly to the text, to make his own idea of the results. Especially, is important for the scientific readers, molecular gastronomy the raw data are also available.
"Scientific progress requires debate and controversy to improve these methods on the basis of objective results," says the editor of the magazine. "Allowing a rational discussion" is the objective announced by the team ralini. For an unpublished study has no scientific value. Impossible to discuss or deepen molecular gastronomy by new research.
For example, the study may now be cited in the risk assessment of GMOs and Roundup. In February, the TC1507 GM maize has been authorized by the European Commission. Among the reasons, the absence of studies demonstrating the toxicity of the product. The study was ralini then relegated to the limbo of scientific knowledge.
Another claim: fostering transparency. "The choice of open source is not trivial, says Criigen. We need all the raw data, including industry, are open access. "For Monsanto and Pioneer does not want to disclose the details of the re