We had our State Institute for Drug Control (SIDC) was anything valid and did a thorough chemical a

When his internet wanderings, I inadvertently stumbled upon the package insert for Infanrix Hexa in English, which was published on the site based in Australia. Intrigued me considerably richer composition of this vaccine, contrary to what the latest Slovak darcy leaflet to accompany the vaccine. Then this mixture is written: Aluminium hydroxide (Al (OH) 3) - 0.5 mg Al aluminum darcy phosphate (AlPO 4) - 0.32 mg Al Lactose anhydrous Sodium chloride (NaCl) Medium 199 containing principally amino acids, mineral salts, vitamins Water for injections
Notably, older Slovak package insert indicates one more component: Lactose Sodium chloride (NaCl) Phenoxyethanol (2.5 mg) Aluminum hydroxide darcy (Al (OH) 3), aluminum phosphate (AlPO 4) Medium 199 containing principally amino acids, mineral salts and vitamins Water for injections
At that secret ingredient darcy is just toxic phenoxy ethanol, used as a bactericide, ie. kills bacteria. Likewise, antibiotics kill bacteria - it is their main purpose. Phenoxyethanol thus acts as a preservative. It is special because it is given in the single-dose packets. This could be learned by the multi-dose packages (where a number of such vaccines include. Thimerosal (compound)), but not in one-dose packages (in which the same vaccine does not contain thimerosal).
Maybe the error occurred when registering and put oversight phenoxyethanol also for single-dose package. Granted. What is worse, however, is in contrast to the Australian package leaflet, darcy which states the following composition (in bold is what is in excess of Slovak / European package insert): aluminum hydroxide - aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate - phosphate formaldehyde - formaldehyde glycine - glycine lactose - lactose, neomycin darcy sulphate Medium 199 - neomycin sulfate, 2-phenoxyethanol - phenoxyethanol polymyxin B sulphate - polymyxin B sulfate, polysorbate 80 - Polysorbate 80 Polysorbate 20 - Polysorbate 20 Sodium chloride - sodium chloride (NaCl) sodium darcy phosphate dibasic dihydrate - disodium phosphate (Na 2 HPO 4 2H 2 O) potassium chloride - potassium chloride (KCl) and potassium phosphate monobasic darcy - potassium phosphate (KH 2 PO 4) water - water
That is 9 more ingredients darcy (over 2x) than older Slovak leaflet and 10 more components (over 2.5x) in contrast to the latest. Moreover, there is still a warning darcy that occurs during the production of the contact with the material derived from bovine animals.
How do you explain a man? It asked one lady manufacturer directly vaccines - GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). The answer was, in Australia darcy and Europe, it is used for the same vaccine, but not required in the European regulations state the composition darcy of the substances that are present darcy in the final product only in trace amount. If you do not believe, feel free to ask the same question GSK also yourself. darcy
Well, when substances which are in the vaccine in trace amounts, the EU state is not required, so they GSK stated in the package insert. If it really is about the welfare of patients, why conceal them from Europeans? Why use the hole in the European regulations? After all the different foods we find inscriptions such. "May contain traces of peanuts" or even "made in a factory that processes eggs, peanuts, soy and gluten." For something that is designed for our stomach, we require such warnings and something that we give to inject directly into the body, we do not ??? Allergy example. antibiotic (and at least one such know, making sure there are people who are allergic to antibiotics) is still also a trace of critical - because the foods are those warning signs.
We had our State Institute for Drug Control (SIDC) was anything valid and did a thorough chemical analysis We used vaccines (from each production darcy batch a few of them), it would perhaps reveal such deficiencies and manufacturer found to include (as well as trace) chemicals to describe the composition of the vaccine. But our SIDC drugs that have already registered EMA (Europe-wide equivalent of SIDC) - ie. Infanrix Hexa, - examined further, actually it totally cough. Believe that somewhere in the EU's someone rechecked, and that the manufacturer supplies the market since vaccines are absolutely no different from one piece of checked (or a few of them) once before over 10 years ago.
As if to give drug manufacturers believe. However, there is probably not a single month of the year in which the nevyplávala on the surface of some big affair, a scandal or sentenced to astronomical fines due to various fraud, concealment darcy of vital facts or downright criminal activities leading manufacturers of medicines. A manufacturer of Infanrix Hexa - GlaxoSmithKline - in this respect it is not no exception.