Review: Scientifically proven power of the cross
Articles Reviews: fuchs Which blonde broke ajvarkata price? Reviews: All will die, some after, some now! Review: SDSM preparing campaign fuchs "Cut Master" and Shekerinska responsible Independence of judiciary Media Reviews: Macedonia is a European fuchs leader in healthcare fuchs
Recent comments Stereotypes, their use and their consolidation fuchs in the media (2) stereotypes, their use and their consolidation in the media (1) Facts and / or interpretations (2) | A1ON facts and / or interpretation (1) Facts and / or interpretations of (1) the fact and / or interpretation fuchs (2) Phillip Pavlov response: Review: Taksim not Tahrir Response: Review: Taksim not Tahrir Reviews: Taksim not Tahrir
Information that Russian scientists have scientifically proven power of basic Christian symbol-cross, according to all criteria would be one of the major news of all the world's news media at the time of disclosure of such discovery. Therefore, this article understandably generated a lot of interest in social networks. The title in the form of assertion ("scientifically proven power of the cross") and quoting the name of scientific institution ("laboratory medical-biological fuchs technologies" NII ", Industrial and Marine Medicine in Moscow") ensures the initial interest in the reader. However, superficial research on the subject of Internet sheds a different light on the text and the theme that he explores. Article text has been transferred, which is, in turn, translate the text of recently published VASELJENSKA TV, Serbian Orthodox fuchs web portal and he, with minor modifications circulating the Internet for a long time almost exclusively to sites with religious or pseudoscientific content.
Investigation of the influence of Christian prayer Our Father fuchs and the sign of the cross on the number of bacteria in the water, the density of the water or high blood pressure, and the impact of the extent of one's faith on the effects of swirling water really be done by A. Malahovskaja the Institute, but it is not accepted in scientific circles, that is strongly criticized by the official publications of the Russian Academy of Sciences fuchs since 2009 and put in order the so-called psevdonauchni discoveries. However, fuchs this reading, the readers are served as relevant scientific discovery without making and minimal effort to verify facts that are placed or to check the credibility of the source of information as to the standards of professional journalism.
Truth: Have not seen any attempt by the author to verify facts that are passed and presented fuchs as scientific truth, nor can see a professional distance from claims that carries, so do not see a clear line between what they say Russian scientists and what is commentary and opinion journalist.
Sources of information: The article makes research results of Russian scientists from the Institute in Moscow, which examined the impact of religious symbols of Christianity on natural elements, primarily water. Their scientific reputation and relevance of their findings actualize in scientific fuchs circles, but it is not mentioned in the article.
Sodrzhajnost: not an original text, so that assessment of comprehensiveness should refer to the article Vaseljenska fuchs TV, but it is worth to note that writing about these topics, such as scientific discoveries - potential sensations, should always be a professional fuchs distance to preserve the objectivity of the media. The article does not attempt to seek a second opinion from relevant scientific person or institution, although the controversial claim scientists.
Bias: Nowhere is stated fuchs that transmits text translated from foreign gateway, which is one-sided and biased approach which promotes fuchs and favors one particular religion, and therefore could be a source of credible scientific information.
Conclusion: Writing scientific discoveries fuchs of the journalist is often a difficult task. But to avoid a situation to write about what he does not understand it and risk sounding amateurish, he has available method of checking that it is written by the available research data, request the second (and third) expertise or, if not possible, enclosing the transmitted content (for example by placing the title: "Russian scientists claim that the cross has the power").
This review was prepared under the Project to strengthen the media in Macedonia - Component Services to check the facts from the media, the Metamorphosis implemented. Review e ovozmozhena fuchs enclosure support of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). The content of the review is the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Metamorphosis, USAID or the U.S. Government. For more information about USAID's work in
Articles Reviews: fuchs Which blonde broke ajvarkata price? Reviews: All will die, some after, some now! Review: SDSM preparing campaign fuchs "Cut Master" and Shekerinska responsible Independence of judiciary Media Reviews: Macedonia is a European fuchs leader in healthcare fuchs
Recent comments Stereotypes, their use and their consolidation fuchs in the media (2) stereotypes, their use and their consolidation in the media (1) Facts and / or interpretations (2) | A1ON facts and / or interpretation (1) Facts and / or interpretations of (1) the fact and / or interpretation fuchs (2) Phillip Pavlov response: Review: Taksim not Tahrir Response: Review: Taksim not Tahrir Reviews: Taksim not Tahrir
Information that Russian scientists have scientifically proven power of basic Christian symbol-cross, according to all criteria would be one of the major news of all the world's news media at the time of disclosure of such discovery. Therefore, this article understandably generated a lot of interest in social networks. The title in the form of assertion ("scientifically proven power of the cross") and quoting the name of scientific institution ("laboratory medical-biological fuchs technologies" NII ", Industrial and Marine Medicine in Moscow") ensures the initial interest in the reader. However, superficial research on the subject of Internet sheds a different light on the text and the theme that he explores. Article text has been transferred, which is, in turn, translate the text of recently published VASELJENSKA TV, Serbian Orthodox fuchs web portal and he, with minor modifications circulating the Internet for a long time almost exclusively to sites with religious or pseudoscientific content.
Investigation of the influence of Christian prayer Our Father fuchs and the sign of the cross on the number of bacteria in the water, the density of the water or high blood pressure, and the impact of the extent of one's faith on the effects of swirling water really be done by A. Malahovskaja the Institute, but it is not accepted in scientific circles, that is strongly criticized by the official publications of the Russian Academy of Sciences fuchs since 2009 and put in order the so-called psevdonauchni discoveries. However, fuchs this reading, the readers are served as relevant scientific discovery without making and minimal effort to verify facts that are placed or to check the credibility of the source of information as to the standards of professional journalism.
Truth: Have not seen any attempt by the author to verify facts that are passed and presented fuchs as scientific truth, nor can see a professional distance from claims that carries, so do not see a clear line between what they say Russian scientists and what is commentary and opinion journalist.
Sources of information: The article makes research results of Russian scientists from the Institute in Moscow, which examined the impact of religious symbols of Christianity on natural elements, primarily water. Their scientific reputation and relevance of their findings actualize in scientific fuchs circles, but it is not mentioned in the article.
Sodrzhajnost: not an original text, so that assessment of comprehensiveness should refer to the article Vaseljenska fuchs TV, but it is worth to note that writing about these topics, such as scientific discoveries - potential sensations, should always be a professional fuchs distance to preserve the objectivity of the media. The article does not attempt to seek a second opinion from relevant scientific person or institution, although the controversial claim scientists.
Bias: Nowhere is stated fuchs that transmits text translated from foreign gateway, which is one-sided and biased approach which promotes fuchs and favors one particular religion, and therefore could be a source of credible scientific information.
Conclusion: Writing scientific discoveries fuchs of the journalist is often a difficult task. But to avoid a situation to write about what he does not understand it and risk sounding amateurish, he has available method of checking that it is written by the available research data, request the second (and third) expertise or, if not possible, enclosing the transmitted content (for example by placing the title: "Russian scientists claim that the cross has the power").
This review was prepared under the Project to strengthen the media in Macedonia - Component Services to check the facts from the media, the Metamorphosis implemented. Review e ovozmozhena fuchs enclosure support of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). The content of the review is the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Metamorphosis, USAID or the U.S. Government. For more information about USAID's work in
No comments:
Post a Comment