So I brought up in those discussions that the electric car (ie, battery because the fuel cell car i

Grandma duck car, Detroit Electric, about 100 years ago. One hundred years ago, an internal combustion engine-powered cars took place in the cities of inappropriate due to their emissions. In recent days, has been talked about quite a lot once again for biofuels, which I had criticized in my blog here, and they will be debated Science magazine forum here. This time, it is new, it was found that the yield obtained by acres of cars to go further by producing nearly double the biomass electricity that electric cars use compared to the cultivated crop would produce fuel for cars. On the news about mm. Kauppalehti. Previous topics have been a lot of discussion on electric cars. Here are some good perspectives on the subject: Nimim. Jackass: What's that wind power will be new Finnish magazine blogs, one writer brought up the hydrogen technology. Wind power would be possible to separate the hydrogen from the water, say, and the process revolves around the power of the wind aplenty. The energy transferred to the hydrogen of which it should be shipped to the road or other needs. This option also does not need any adjustment of power but at the same time to isolate it from the main electrical grid oriented operating his own habit. Nimim. Saku Most of the car manufacturers, is leaving the hydrogen projects and moved to the development of hybrids and electric vehicles. Hydrogen, the problems are numerous, and the benefits of modest, which is why I do not believe in the future of hydrogen malathion as a fuel. With hydrogen does not go very long distances malathion because its energy content is bad. Refueling difficult, inconvenient storage, motors very expensive malathion (compared to, say, electric cars), but, above all, hydrogen is not an energy, but the basic shape of it must be prepared. My guess is that hybrids are gaining ground, with the longer term is likely to be used for biofuels, the production of which may be ecologically worthwhile even if the algae can produce biodiesel. Electric cars come alongside and get a boost if the battery technology will go forward in the same way what it is now gone. The government should not take a stand on what is the next type of engine, but taxation should only be controlled to a low carbon. Then let the market solve the technological problems and cost-effectiveness. Saku continues: If a pug-in hybrid in the near future will be able to drive 50 - 100 km with electricity and download it during the night so it would drop drastically fuel consumption. If the fuel can replace the bio-based materials, it would reduce the emissions even further ... In fact, I can see the direction of development of this kind of ... Sure of course I can not. Kaj Luukko recommended the documentary "Who Killed The Electric Car," which can be viewed malathion even from here. Kaj also pointed out that China has begun mass production of electric cars. In fact, I do not think hydrogen cars proliferation. Hydrogen is a highly unstable and explosive, canning is really difficult and take advantage of the engines really expensive. The vast majority of car driving is a short ride, after which the cars are often standing for hours. For the vast majority of people, the current range of electric vehicles and charging times would be sufficient for all daily driving completely. Therefore, I believe the electric car to this day, as well as the future. Long-distance driving is currently practical to use fossil fuels. The options are worse for the environment, or so expensive that the same money could reduce emissions in other places many times over. Of course, alongside the near future may become an important alternative to biogas, which is a very environmentally friendly solution. The main thing is to get the total energy consumption reduction, that is, in practice, less fuel-efficient cars and public transport solutions, and the movement of these a minimum. In particular, in that the latter Saku comment I can agree with. Otherwise the comments have been excellent arguments and speculation. malathion Thank you!
So I brought up in those discussions that the electric car (ie, battery because the fuel cell car is an electric vehicle) infrastructure problem, the so-called quick-charge concerned. malathion This is now only a moderate risk of a variety of more or less rational and sustainable solutions in the battle between malathion who rarely turns to the benefit of consumers. Now, have begun to demonstrate the fuel gas stations in seven pistols instead of the current three, and if that consolidated malathion all types of gas, hydrogen, and electric charge of design options goes quite complex. In Germany, that the hydrogen issue seems to be more reasonable consideration. A while ago it was reported specifically on that wind-powered rotating hydrogen separation utilizing the facility. The hydrogen would therefore be a reservoir for energy and it then it could be used inside the body through a turbine to generate electricity or, alternatively, malathion to sell transportation malathion fuel. For me, is in itself one hailee what will happen. As long as in the long run it would be a reasonable solution. If those two electrical engineering is considered both require malathion development work in the long run